CSS also accomplishes this end very simply in the web design world.
Dreamweaver has editable regions within templates that are roughly analogous and serve a great function. different text, different image source), and in InD this cannot be achieved, not through object, character, or paragraph styles, or through snippets, object libraries, or templates. There is a totally valid and practical need for controlled and repititous positioning and sizing, with a sustained link to a master, while leaving content changeable (i.e. If it needs to be changed on every page it doesn't belong on a master.įrankly is wrong. This is a very important thing for a page layout program like InD, and its omission as a feature is down to bad design by Adobe, plain and simple. There is no way to do what the OP asked - a very basic and important task - to have a text box that repeats on every page using the master, has editable text, and remains tied to the master in terms of its size and placement. VARCHAR vs.The answer is that InDesign has some serious flaws in its functionality, and this is a big one. Next Next post: Waiting for PostgreSQL 15 – Allow publishing the tables of schema.
/GettyImages-57353988-590a59cd3df78c92834b7b62.jpg "quarkxpress 8.5 automatically add pages when text inserted")
Posted on | Tags advisor, index, pganalyze, postgresql, slack, statistics, suggestion | And if you don't know what to do, try various indexes, run query through explain analyze and compare times.
Remember that any columns in index after column used for inequality comparison, will be most likely not compared against index, but rather will be filtered outĪll things said – understanding it all comes with practice. Remember that generally speaking you can have only one inequality condition in query being efficiently handled by index scan. If you can get 2 columns to match 1000 rows out of million, and adding 3rd will reduce the match to 900 – don't add the 3rd – it will be, most likely, better in the long term to do index scan on these two columns only, and filter the rest normally. Don't add too many columns to index – it will make it larger, and less efficient. If you have condition that you “always" use (or, at least very often) – you can put it in WHERE part of index definition. If selectivity of condition is low (almost all rows match) – there is no point in putting the column in index. What are general rules when deciding on index? The difference is that index with where will be simply smaller.įor example, on my test table, index on (a, d, b) is 808kB, while index on (a,b) where d = ‘done' is only 72kB. So index on (a, d, b) would find just one row.īut, if you usually search for d = ‘done' then index on (a,b) where d = ‘done'. $ select count ( * ) filter ( where a = 12 ) as matching_a, count ( * ) filter ( where d = 'done' ) as matching_d, count ( * ) filter ( where a = 12 and d = 'done' ) as matching_ad
0 kommentar(er)
